Welcome to this blog!
I am really getting tired of the 911 Truth Movement. Having read lots of articles, having listened to numerous field researchers, activists and even witnesses, I have come to the realization that the 911 Truth Movement is not about revealing the truth about the 911 attacks, but actually about burying it even deeper in the sheer volume of information, or shall I say disinformation. Nowadays there is more so much information circling the net about the issue that getting to the bottom of it is quite impossible. In fact, I figured that it is by design so.
During my Internet search I have come across quite an interesting article shedding some light on the 911 Truth Movement. It is titled "Ruppert and Hopsicker Co-Opting the 9-11 Truth Movement". You can find it here:
These folks are an alternative news source and I must say they really dig deep into 911 related matters.
This is what these guys have to say about the main players of the 911 Truth Movement:
"The more we look into the backgrounds of the main players involved in 9-11 research, the more links we find. Ruppert was a member of Hopsicker’s CIA drug running online discussion list. It is interesting therefore that Hopsicker and Ruppert have since had somewhat of a falling out in recent months, mainly due to information that Hopsicker dug up on Pinnacle Quest International (PQI), a company offering "little-known insider secrets of wealth creation" to its customers and from which Ruppert had accepted 4 all expenses paid trips to Cancun with a $1,000 dollar speaking fee. Hopsicker claims that PQI runs scam operations, and with a price tag of $7,500 for 21 CDs, we tend to agree with him. Unsurprisingly, as a result of this interaction with Hopsicker, Ruppert threatened to sue."
Me: Having observed through the Internet interactions of many players within the Movement I was often puzzled by the fact that they often work against each other instead of joining forces. However, taking the above example of the two gentlemen into consideration I started to understand that this apparent hostility tries to cover the fact that they used to "work" together and played in the same team with the CIA in the background. How suprising. Well, not really.
Through this apparent hostility they successfully hide their past, don't they? They also take the attention away from the real issues related to the 911 attacks, in my opinion. They are like two magicians trying to attract attention of the audience to some desired place, while the place of real action is missing the scrutiny of many eyes.
Here is another interesting quote that seems to confirm my theory:
"Now all of this gives the impression that Hopsicker and Ruppert are on opposing sides and one of them is telling the truth and the other is selling the lie. But as I have already mentioned, nothing is ever that simple in the world of CoIntelPro. You see, even with his "peak oil" slant, Ruppert and his message ran the risk of being just one more voice in the melee of 9-11 investigators and investigations currently entrenched on the internet. In the world of CoIntelPro, there are many ways to draw attention to the lie that you have to sell, and each particular method is tailored to be most effective in deceiving a specific audience. In the case of the conspiratorially-aware members of the alternative news communities on the net, one way to draw attention to disinformation is to have someone attack it AS disinformation."
Me: So, apparently the two gentlemen are fighting each other, while in reality they are two members of the same team. This article seems to even suggest that they are agents of the Counter Intelligence Program. Well, honestly, I would not be surprised if it were in fact true.
"Looking at the current infighting going on at present, it would appear that CoIntelPro agents have done a fine job. No one knows who is who anymore, everyone suspects everyone else, and those members of the public whose minds are not, as yet, welded shut will be the ones to suffer most from the lack of coherent information about what really happened on 911, who really is to blame, or what the real issue is."
Exactly. That's what I was frustrated with when I was researching the issue of 911 attacks. There is such a noise level that it is nearly impossible to find anything of value. But I guess it is so by design.
By the way, did you know that this Ruppert guy is supporting the population reduction? Check his own words:
"I advocate an immediate convening of political, economic, spiritual and scientific leaders from all nations to address the issue of Peak Oil (and Gas) and its immediate implications for economic collapse, massive famine and climate destruction (partially as a result of reversion to coal plants which accelerate global warming). This would, scientifically speaking, include immediate steps to arrive at a crash program – agreed to by all nations and in accordance with the highest spiritual and ethical principles – to stop global population growth and to arrive at the best possible and most ethical program of population reduction as a painful choice made by all of humanity."
Painful choice? Population reduction? This guy is really going too far. I bet he is not including himself in the group of those to be reduced, or should I say killed.
Anyhow, the article says some more interesting things about the 911 attacks and research related to it:
"For any 9-11 investigator to come out and say that a 757 plane definitely hit the Pentagon is to rob the public of the singularly most important aspect of 9-11 and the one that has the chance to blow the whole dastardly plot wide open."
"Certainly, there is much evidence that shows that Flight 11 and Flight 175 really did hit the twin towers, forcing 9-11 investigators to resort to other, and less convincing, aspects of the events of that day to make their case that it was an inside job."
"This brings us to the point about the Pentagon attack which is that there exists striking evidence to suggest that it was NOT a 757 that hit the Pentagon, and it is for this very reason that Flight 77 presents THE best opportunity to bring the 9-11 deception to public awareness."
I really think that the Pentagon strike is the key issue to understand the 911 genesis and anybody trying to downplay the importance of it is in actuality deceiving the public and his/her intentions should be examined.