Wednesday, February 23, 2005

Death of the American Republic...

I have just found an interesting piece of article by Richard M. Dolan. You can read it here.

He asks some interesting questions in regard to the 911 attacks. Here they are, I quote:

"For now, it is at least enough to ask:

(1) Regarding the Pentagon attack, how were bodies from the Boeing 757 identified, while at the same time 60 tons of metal supposedly vaporized?"

My comment: how about they were not identified as they were nowhere close to Pentagon. How about Wright Patterson?

"(2) Also regarding the Pentagon, how could a student pilot make a Boeing 757 jet nosedive toward the ground and then, a la Harry Potter at a quidditch match, pull up at the last moment and zoom along without radar guidance toward his target, literally inches above the ground?"

My comments: how about a small commuter jet remotely controlled?

"(3) How did that 757 – essentially a hollow tube – pierce six reinforced walls of the Pentagon fortress? No source I have read has convincingly explained how this could have happened. Incidentally, the final hole, of which there is fortunately a photograph, is remarkably well-defined, and about 7 feet in diameter."

My comments: how about explosives onboard?

"(4) Why were at least two independent video cameras of the Pentagon attack confiscated, and why are they still unavailable to the public?"

My comments: how about they hold the key to the mystery.

"(5) Why did NORAD’s standard defense procedures -- procedures which had worked efficiently for years and years, and which were activated 70 times in the 12 months before 9/11 -- fail on that single morning?"

My comments: how about by deliberate actions following instructions from the gov.

"(6) Why did Building 7 of the WTC complex -- a 47 story tall steel frame structure -- collapse as it did at 5:30 p.m. (no significant debris or aircraft hit it); and why did it sure as hell look as though it came down as a controlled demolition?"

My comments: how about the entire collapse was a controlled demolition?

"(7) What exactly did WTC landlord Larry Silverstein mean when he told PBS that he and the Fire Chief agreed at 5 p.m. to "pull" Building 7? "Pull" is construction lingo for controlled demolition. Since you can’t wire a building that quickly, ipso facto it was pre-wired. If Building 7, why not the North and South Towers? And if so, why not admit it?"

My comments: how about the WTC buildings were wired with explosives already during their contruction?

"(8) Along these lines, why would numerous witnesses on the ground in lower Manhattan, including several NYC fire fighters, speak of a series of explosions emanating from the South Tower during its collapse? Such explosions were of a kind that would be consistent with the theory of controlled demolition."

My comments: how about the South Tower was being pulled down?

"(9) What was the true relationship between Al Qaeda, the Pakistani intelligence agency ISI, and the CIA?"

My comments: how about different subsidiaries of the same world-wide secret power?

"(10) Why for an entire year did the President try to prevent a commission from forming to investigate the event?"

My comments: how about to try to avoid revealing the truth and cover his involvement?

"(11) Why did the committee itself -- appropriately referred to by Michael Ruppert as "mobbed up" friends of the President and National Security Advisor -- egregiously and steadfastly refuse to do a real investigation? (And please do not bother citing that travesty known as the 9/11 Commission Report, which deals forthrightly with none of these questions.)"

My comments: how about to confuse the public and bury the truth even deeper?

And so the story goes...

Tuesday, February 22, 2005

Bloggers rule...

Check this one out. The truth will always find its way to the daylight. No matter how hard those guys in the gov try to bury it.

"Gannon" scandal leads to link between high-level Republicans, high-level Democrats

I will quote a few paragraphs with comments:

"On Saturday, Feb. 12, a blogger, going by the screen-name "Do You Ever Wonder", posted the first of his discoveries as a thread on Democratic Underground.com."

Bloggers rule! I believe the blog phenomenon is starting to save the day and bring the real news to the people.

"The evidence shows that John Kerry had hired the Washington lobbying firm Quinn Gillespie & Associates to do work for his 2004 campaign.
The firm's two founding partners are each political heavy-hitters, Jack Quinn for the Democratic Party and Ed Gillespie as 2004 Republican National Committee chairman."

There you go! It is so interesting that in the biz those fellows are playing one team, while in politics they are in opposition, apparently. It is showing what these two parties really are: two fractions of the same party. So sake of appearances, I might add.

"From information gleaned from the firm's web site, it was learned that Marc Lampkin, a Quinn Gillespie lobbyist, was a Bush campaign
manager, while another employee of the firm, Bruce Andrews, was political director for the Kerry/Edwards coordinating committee in
Pennsylvania. Yet another employee, Manuel Ortiz, was involved in the overall leadership structure of the Democratic Party, including both policy and fundraising, raising money for Kerry."

How convenient this was for Bush and Kerry. Is this really democracy or a mockery? The same firm runs the election for both camps.

"A large, influential public relations firm such as this might normally have clients of all political persuasions, and were it not a
presidential election year, it would raise nary an eyebrow. However, for the chair of the Republican National Committee (even though
Gillespie officially took "unpaid leave" from his firm to work on Bush's 2004 campaign) to be just one degree removed from the Kerry
campaign, casts a shadow of suspicion regarding possible collusion between the Democratic and Republican parties. At the very least, it
represents an obvious conflict of interest."

Shall I suggest that it is just ONE party and the election show is just for the people to believe they live in democracy, while in actuality these two powers are in bed with each other.

Just my 2 cents.

Saturday, February 19, 2005

The second wave on its way...

Today I have found an interesting article by John Kaminski. It is titled 'The second wave'. I would like to quote some parts of it.

He writes:

"And people began calling me, telling me about their meetings. I didn't dare believe it was a second wave. But the calls kept coming."

"The first thought I had was that the second wave shouldn't make the same mistakes the first wave did. The first wave failed. The perps, so far, have gotten away with their evil deeds. In fact, one of the so-called leaders of the first wave, Mike Ruppert, has declared the 9/11 issue dead. Good. He's retired. We don't need him. He was the prime saboteur of the first wave, ruining the first big 9/11 forum in San Francisco with his oil company propaganda."


As you see, John being a good observer as he is, has formulated a similar opinion on Mike Ruppert as I was presenting in my previous post. Good to know that this was not just a single opinion of mine or some other fringe observers, but it is shared by as esteemed journalist of alternative press as John. He carries on:

"The second wave should know that peak oil has nothing to do with 9/11. It's a disinformational distraction. Peak oil is a trend that may or may not be true. Most honest people think it's just another oil company ruse to jack up prices. But even if it is a serious social problem, it has nothing to do with 9/11, the crime of the century, about which most of the public has been told nothing but lies."

Right. Peak oil issue is exactly that, a distraction, to take people's attention away from the real issue, which is:

"Our leaders lied about what happened. They refused to hold an investigation. They destroyed the evidence. They hid the videotapes. They blamed Muslims but didn't to this day produce a shred of evidence against them. They deceived our own air defenses with bogus drills designed to confuse everyone. They invented fantastic cellphone calls. They met with terrorists and let important witnesses slip out of the country. The list of their deceptive maneuvers is nearly endless."

I think he really nails it here. The entire official version of 911 attacks is a scam or a very good con art. It is amazing what spin official media managed to doctor about 911 and many people swollowed it. I guess the truth will be eventually revealed and I wonder what the crazy Neocons in D.C. will do then? I take a guess: blame the Israel. You do not believe it is possible?

Wait and see. Just you wait...

Thursday, February 17, 2005

The Pentagon Strike...

Hi there, I am back.

I strongly advise anybody trying to get to the bottom of 911 attacks to view the Pentagon Strike Flash Presentation, if he or she has not done it yet.

In previous post I was trying to draw my readers' attention to the mess within the 911 Truth Movement. Today, I plan to do the same with the Pentagon Strike, based on above mentioned presentation.

My estimations as to how many people in the world actually saw this curious presentation range from 200 to 300 million people worldwide. In other words between 3,5 and 5 % of world's population. This is just a wild guess, based my alternative sources.

Now, the reason I like this presentation is that it brings together facts and a good piece of detective work on behalf of the creator. It also uses the visual evidence which the Powers That Be are trying to hide as much as they can.

There are some essential aspects of the Pentagon attack that need to be answered. One of them is the location of impact. Whatever hit the Pentagon, it has targeted the area generally used by the Navy, or to be more precise the Office of Naval Intelligence. I can't help but wonder if that was by design. Defense Department is not really in full control of the Navy, which maintains its relative independence. I guess some folks in the Pentagon do not like it too much and here we may actually have a motive to strike this section of the building as well as of the military.

The Office of Naval Intelligence is older than most of the post-war US agencies and thus enjoys relative respect and independence. It flies below the radar, so to say. The war centered plans of the Pentagon are not necessarily supported by the Navy and Rummy must really struggle to get those guys on his side. I would like to mention that the Philadelphia Experiment was carried out by the Navy and I would imagine that the Navy learned a lot from it, thus becoming even stronger force in the US military.

Anyhow, I just wonder why this particular section of the Pentagon building was hit and assuming it happened for a reason, what reason is that? Could it actually point to the real perpetrators of the 911 event? Could be.

Enjoy the presentation...

Wednesday, February 16, 2005

The 911 Truth Movement.

Welcome to this blog!

I am really getting tired of the 911 Truth Movement. Having read lots of articles, having listened to numerous field researchers, activists and even witnesses, I have come to the realization that the 911 Truth Movement is not about revealing the truth about the 911 attacks, but actually about burying it even deeper in the sheer volume of information, or shall I say disinformation. Nowadays there is more so much information circling the net about the issue that getting to the bottom of it is quite impossible. In fact, I figured that it is by design so.

During my Internet search I have come across quite an interesting article shedding some light on the 911 Truth Movement. It is titled "Ruppert and Hopsicker Co-Opting the 9-11 Truth Movement". You can find it here:

http://signs-of-the-times.org/signs/exposing_the_big_con.htm

These folks are an alternative news source and I must say they really dig deep into 911 related matters.

This is what these guys have to say about the main players of the 911 Truth Movement:

"The more we look into the backgrounds of the main players involved in 9-11 research, the more links we find. Ruppert was a member of Hopsicker’s CIA drug running online discussion list. It is interesting therefore that Hopsicker and Ruppert have since had somewhat of a falling out in recent months, mainly due to information that Hopsicker dug up on Pinnacle Quest International (PQI), a company offering "little-known insider secrets of wealth creation" to its customers and from which Ruppert had accepted 4 all expenses paid trips to Cancun with a $1,000 dollar speaking fee. Hopsicker claims that PQI runs scam operations, and with a price tag of $7,500 for 21 CDs, we tend to agree with him. Unsurprisingly, as a result of this interaction with Hopsicker, Ruppert threatened to sue."

Me: Having observed through the Internet interactions of many players within the Movement I was often puzzled by the fact that they often work against each other instead of joining forces. However, taking the above example of the two gentlemen into consideration I started to understand that this apparent hostility tries to cover the fact that they used to "work" together and played in the same team with the CIA in the background. How suprising. Well, not really.

Through this apparent hostility they successfully hide their past, don't they? They also take the attention away from the real issues related to the 911 attacks, in my opinion. They are like two magicians trying to attract attention of the audience to some desired place, while the place of real action is missing the scrutiny of many eyes.

Here is another interesting quote that seems to confirm my theory:

"Now all of this gives the impression that Hopsicker and Ruppert are on opposing sides and one of them is telling the truth and the other is selling the lie. But as I have already mentioned, nothing is ever that simple in the world of CoIntelPro. You see, even with his "peak oil" slant, Ruppert and his message ran the risk of being just one more voice in the melee of 9-11 investigators and investigations currently entrenched on the internet. In the world of CoIntelPro, there are many ways to draw attention to the lie that you have to sell, and each particular method is tailored to be most effective in deceiving a specific audience. In the case of the conspiratorially-aware members of the alternative news communities on the net, one way to draw attention to disinformation is to have someone attack it AS disinformation."

Me: So, apparently the two gentlemen are fighting each other, while in reality they are two members of the same team. This article seems to even suggest that they are agents of the Counter Intelligence Program. Well, honestly, I would not be surprised if it were in fact true.

"Looking at the current infighting going on at present, it would appear that CoIntelPro agents have done a fine job. No one knows who is who anymore, everyone suspects everyone else, and those members of the public whose minds are not, as yet, welded shut will be the ones to suffer most from the lack of coherent information about what really happened on 911, who really is to blame, or what the real issue is."

Exactly. That's what I was frustrated with when I was researching the issue of 911 attacks. There is such a noise level that it is nearly impossible to find anything of value. But I guess it is so by design.

By the way, did you know that this Ruppert guy is supporting the population reduction? Check his own words:

"I advocate an immediate convening of political, economic, spiritual and scientific leaders from all nations to address the issue of Peak Oil (and Gas) and its immediate implications for economic collapse, massive famine and climate destruction (partially as a result of reversion to coal plants which accelerate global warming). This would, scientifically speaking, include immediate steps to arrive at a crash program – agreed to by all nations and in accordance with the highest spiritual and ethical principles – to stop global population growth and to arrive at the best possible and most ethical program of population reduction as a painful choice made by all of humanity."

Painful choice? Population reduction? This guy is really going too far. I bet he is not including himself in the group of those to be reduced, or should I say killed.

Anyhow, the article says some more interesting things about the 911 attacks and research related to it:

"For any 9-11 investigator to come out and say that a 757 plane definitely hit the Pentagon is to rob the public of the singularly most important aspect of 9-11 and the one that has the chance to blow the whole dastardly plot wide open."

"Certainly, there is much evidence that shows that Flight 11 and Flight 175 really did hit the twin towers, forcing 9-11 investigators to resort to other, and less convincing, aspects of the events of that day to make their case that it was an inside job."

"This brings us to the point about the Pentagon attack which is that there exists striking evidence to suggest that it was NOT a 757 that hit the Pentagon, and it is for this very reason that Flight 77 presents THE best opportunity to bring the 9-11 deception to public awareness."

I really think that the Pentagon strike is the key issue to understand the 911 genesis and anybody trying to downplay the importance of it is in actuality deceiving the public and his/her intentions should be examined.