The Meaning of March 11.

Since this Friday saw the fist anniversary of Mardid attacks, let's try to see if we can understand their meaning.

I will be quoting from this article.

"March 11, 2005 marks the first anniversary of the Madrid bombing as well as forty-two months since the false flag operation carried out by the neocons and Israel against the people of the United States and the world."

Obviously, the choice of date of Madrid attack is curious. 3/11 shows great similarity to 9/11. Does the date give us a clue about the occult/hidden meaning of these two events and their possible connetion? I think it is the case.

"We have heard two different theories given to explain the bombings. The first suggests that Mossad had a hand in it. The argument here is that bringing the bombing home to Spain, so to speak, would convince the Spanish people that the war on terror was an immediate threat to them, and, scared of further attacks, they would rush to re-elect Aznar in order to buttress the Coalition of the Willing against the Axis of Evil. In this explanation, the bombing was a black ops operation gone bad."

One good possibility. If the 9/11 event was supposed to make American people support the administration's 'War on Terror', then the 3/11 could be meant to do the same for Spanish people.

"The second theory suggests that the bombs were the work of rogue elements of a French intelligence service who wished to stir up the anti-war feelings of the Spanish to vote out Aznar's government. If this theory is correct, the operation was a success -- which opens a whole other can of worms."

Knowing French resistance to Bush's war in Iraq this could be true. But would French intelligence service use such tactics as the Mossad and CIA? Maybe this part of agency that sympathizes with USA could be capable of pulling such a dirty trick.

"Not long after the Madrid bombings, it was pointed out that there were 911 days between the attacks on September 11, 2001 and on March 11, 2004. For those who seek to read the signs, the clues offered to us by the universe to understand the workings behind the veil of illusion, this fact is suggestive.

Therein lies the clue. 911 days between attacks. Somebody must have chosen dates carefully here, which could mean the same force behind both events.

"As is the following:"

"And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him? And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months. [Rev. 13:4-5]

Bible gives us a clue here. It has been 42 months since 911 and the question remains what is going to happen after those 42 months? Soon we will know.

The Language Police - Welcome to USA 2005!

Check this one out:

http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0226-27.htm

'The Language Police: Gettin' Jiggy with Frank Luntz'

by Nancy Snow

Nancy writes:

"If you need any more confirmation that America is the numero uno propaganda nation, look no further than the GOP language meistro Frank Luntz, who has produced a memorandum of "The 14 Words Never to Use." Thanks to the Internet and the blogosphere, we mere mortals can get our grubby mitts on what the conservative elite persuader Luntz is doing to scrub our brains free of individual thoughts."

My comment: Yes, most of todays news in USA is just that: propaganda. The only way any independently thinking American can get some real factual news these days is by gettin' on-line and finding some alternative news sources or reasonable blogs. However, it seems that soon even bloggin' can get you in hot water. Rummy will make sure that even this source runs dry soon.

"Consider the first word expunged from
our memory - government. It's such a bad word to Luntz that it must
be replaced by Washington. "The fact is, most Americans appreciate
their local government that picks up their trash, cleans their
streets, and provides police and transportation services. Washington
is the problem." This is why he tells members of Congress (and their
spouses!) to remind voters that Washington is the bogey man,
Washington is the problem, Washington has regulations, Washington
taxes. Hmm. Something seems fishy here. Does this mean our own
President hates his government job in Washington? If Washington is
the problem, then why doesn't the President, who represents
Washington, just step aside and let the people rule themselves?"

My comment: yeah, right! That's actually a very sound idea! Self-government. Why do we need a president or a government at all?

"But wait, there's more! Never say privatization in reference to
social security. It evokes images of fat cats on Wall Street picking
our pockets. Reserve privatization for everything else related to the
social good and collective security (education, health care, trade,
criminal justice). The better choice is personalization and personal
accounts. This sounds like 'We The People' have more control over our
private, oops, I mean personal lives. Luntz explains: "Personalizing
Social Security suggests ownership and control over your retirement
savings, while privatizing it suggests a profit motive and winners
and losers."

My comment: That's essentially what the entire privatization of social security is: stealing people's money by a few fat cats from Wall Street. I wonder what they offered Bush in exchange? A bunker?

"Getting the picture? We need to stop using the language of what happens to real people and replace it with the language of the corporation, which has no purpose other than profit and no conscience. Luntz is particularly jiggy with trade language. He implores us to stop using "foreign" or "global" and replace it with "international." Foreign is just too scary to patriotic nativists. In his memo, "The Eleven Steps to Effective Trade Communication," he says that wordsmiths must appeal to America's greatness. "Americans love being told we're the best, that we're number one. We will do anything-ANYTHING-to remain number one, and will oppose anything that undermines our superiority. It is essential in any discussion of trade to declare that we are 'the greatest economic power in the world' and that 'we will remain the greatest economic power in the world only so long as we continue to do business with other nations.'" Anyone who opposes "international" trade should be called a "defeatist" for giving up the fight to be number one. There's just a tiny step further here to calling anyone who questions the fairness and justice of certain trade agreements as, dare I say it, "un-American" or even "anti-American."

My comment: if you point out the unfairness of trade deals with USA, you are labeled anti-American? If it carries on like this, soon you can be put to jail for voicing your opinions on American global, sorry, international trade or military policy, does not really matter which one you dare to question as they are one and the same tool of global domination.

Propaganda rules, just like it did in Germany in the days prior to WWII. Are we living in the days prior to WWIII? Hard to say with certainty, but more and more signs point that we in fact may be.